Independence: The Dream, the Quest, and the Reality
July 1st, 2010R. Alan Lewis
President, Ground Zero Books, Ltd.
As the Americans among us are about to celebrate our Independence Day, it is appropriate to reflect on the universality of human striving for independence, freedom, and self-determination. As in the Presidential exhortation before the climatic battle in the classic film, Independence Day, the concept of “independence” in not uniquely an aspect of American Exceptionalism, it is a global, and perhaps ultimately, an intergalactic trans-species concept. It often is born, saved, or restored out of the throes of warfare. It is fundamentally a political state, defined and preserved by civilian domestic and international political processes. And while there are at times exceptions, in general independent nations, especially democracies, tend to seek to live in peace with their neighbors and to seek economic and/or political union voluntary (such as the European Community) where in the past under dictatorships or monarchies, unification (such as the unions of Germany and Italy) were accomplished by force of arms.
But before going further into this paean to Independence, we want to acknowledge the unprecedented response to our June column. We are gratified that so many felt that story of the young untested Lieutenant F. E. Fleck, Jr., at Pearl Harbor was a fitting point of focus for Memorial Day reflection, in his own right and as an exemplar of all the others who have served and sacrificed on behalf of their nations. We also very much appreciated the acknowledgement of our commitment to sound historiography and our effective use of modern research tools. While we do not need to apply this level of rigor to all of our offerings, we frequently do so in order to adequately and effectively present items for our consideration. As many of you already know from firsthand experience, we are happy to delve deeper, at the request of clients with serious interest in specific items, into the background of authors, printing history, and status of works in their areas of historical or political literature.
But now let us shift back to Independence. Of course we have many works on the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence. The date of July 4th has achieved mythic status in the American culture and psyche. If Robert E. Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia had been victorious at the Battle of Gettysburg, perhaps July 3rd would have achieved similar status had the nationhood of the Confederate States of American been so achieved? There is a growing literature of the “what if” variety of historical speculation, and we have examples of those including conjectures by Newt Gingrich. In the first case, our Independence Day reflects the political decision taken that declared our nation, and our people, free of British rule. At other times, in other contexts, the date of independence comes from a strategic victory, such as that of the Viet Minh over the French at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu. The political processes took time to ratify the results, whether by the Treaty of Paris or the Geneva Accords, but the dates of those agreements are in the province of scholars and perhaps advanced Jeopardy players, and are not embedded in the fiber of a nation.
Independence is not just a national political state; it is an individual political state, and part of an individual’s character. In some parts of the United States, there are more declared political independents than declared members of either the Republican or Democratic parties. The dynamics of the political process has shifted from machine politics delivering the votes of the party faithful (including those who took voting as a grave responsibility and continued to cast their ballots after their deaths), to establishing a stronger community of interest on issues with both independents and members of the other major party. There does not seem to be as clear a Republican equivalent to the Blue Dog Democrats who align with the Republicans, but that may be because Teddy Roosevelt co-opted the Bull Moose, John Anderson was mascot deprived, and Ross Perot could not break out of the Big Ear image. For some reason, the Democrats were not able to get any traction with the concept of “Pink Elephants”!
Beyond the political affiliations, we have a long history of respecting people who have an independent streak, who reflect this in their character, their outlook, and their deeds. We have many biographies of leaders who laid out their principles and their course of action, and who resisted the easy path of “go along to get along.” Many paid a price for their commitment, for their independence. Some we may share ends with, but not means—such as John Brown. Some we may share both ends and means with, such as the commitment to non-violence of Mahatma Gandhi. We may disdain both the ends and the means of others, such as Lenin, but we cannot argue that even with his commitment to collectivism and communism, in his time, he was an outcast, a visionary, and had a streak of independence in this thought and action.
So, as we in the United States pause to enjoy, and hopefully appreciate, our independence in this month of July, we hope that all of our clients are able to enjoy peace, freedom, and personal, political, and national independence. We of course, remain ever ready to process your individual and independent selections from our diverse stock of books, pamphlets, ephemera, and frankly odd-ball items. Upon request, we will grant a ten percent discount on purchases through our website.









