Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq. Markup on H.J. Res. 114, October 2 and October 3, 2002
Washington, DC: GPO, 2002. First? Edition. First? Printing. 197, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2002. First? Edition. First? Printing. 197, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1995. 3, wraps, some creasing along edges This message from President Clinton transmits a report regarding activities taken and money spent pursuant to the emergency declaration, pursuant to section 204 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and section 401(c) of the National Emergencies Act. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1995. 24 cm, 98, wraps, illus. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1998. 24 cm, 85, wraps, illus. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2004. 64, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2003. First? Edition. First? Printing. 38, wraps, illus. Serial No. 44. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2001. First? Edition. First? Printing. 48, wraps. More
Arlington, VA: JPRS, 1979. Quarto, 63, wraps, small rust stains to covers. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2005. First? Edition. First? Printing. 70, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2002. First? Edition. First? Printing. 114, wraps, illus. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1994. 203, wraps, appendices. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1997. 340, wraps, appendices, waviness to entire document. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1997. First? Edition. First? Printing. 340, wraps, "X" mark on front page. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1974. 24 cm, 71, wraps, some wear and soiling to covers. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2002. First? Edition. First? Printing. 86, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1999. First? Edition. First? Printing. 48, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2003. 487, wraps, illus., footnotes, covers somewhat worn and soiled, cover creased. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1997. 23 cm, 47, wraps, slight wear and soiling to covers, small edge tear on last page. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 2002. First? Edition. First? Printing. 71, wraps. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1994. 137, wraps, appendices, slight soiling to rear cover. More
Washington, DC: GPO, 1933. 75, wraps, figures, tables, text has darkened, small stains and some soiling to covers. More
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, c1991. 25 cm, 183, DJ soiled. More
Geneva: UNIDIR, 1982. 25 cm, 449. More
Washington DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1993. Presumed First Edition, First printing. Wraps. viii, 263, [1] pages. Illustrations. Index. Cover has some wear and soiling. The Office of Technology Assessment produced some of the best writing on security-related technical issues. The authors summarize the principal technologies of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons production. Purists will observe that chemical weapons are not really weapons of mass destruction, but in this context that is a quibble. The report examines the variety of pathways states may pursue to acquire these weapons. Even more important, it explains (in mercifully clear language) the variety of indicators that intelligence or inspection agencies may track to detect the production of such weapons. The discussion of the indicators or traces of proliferation efforts is good in itself, but the authors go further by discussing the ways in which proliferators can conceal evidence or mislead would-be snoopers. In short, an indispensable work. More
Washington DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1993. Presumed First Edition, First printing. Wraps. vii, [1], 123, [1] pages. Illustrations. Footnotes. Index. Cover has slight wear and soiling. Since the end of the Cold War, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction has become much more prominent in U.S. national security and foreign policy planning. Revelations about Iraqi, North Korean, South African, and Israeli nuclear weapon programs, the possibility of a nuclear arms race in South Asia, and the multidimensional conflicts in the Middle East all point to the immediacy of this problem. At least three main factors underlie this renewed emphasis on proliferation. First, the reduced military threat from the former Soviet Union has increased the relative importance of lesser powers, especially if armed with weapons of mass destruction. Second, certain international political and technological trends are increasing the threat to international security from proliferation. Third, new opportunities are opening for enhancing the current international regimes designed to stem proliferation. Since at least as far back as the 1960s the United States has recognized that proliferation is a global problem and combating it requires high levels of international cooperation. This country has also exerted unilateral influence to discourage proliferation. Nevertheless, placing priority on nonproliferation will require the further development and enforcement of international norms and behavior supporting that objective. More